Research2026-10-07

The University of Maryland ran a controlled trial of its AI study assistant. Only 15 percent of students in the study used it. The tool slightly reduced final grades and course participation. Students also had access to other AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini. Most users asked for information rather than practice or feedback. Few instructors switched the tool to tutor mode. The university is delaying wider deployment. Researchers called for more faculty training on AI tools. The study highlights the difficulty of measuring AI’s impact on learning.

What changed

The university had not yet run a controlled trial of its study assistant before campus deployment.

What it unlocks

Understanding how students engage with university-built AI tools before wider rollout.

  • 15% of students used the tool
  • 2,379 students participated
  • 73.8% used it for information
  • 11.3% used it for practice

Send this to someone who needs it

Shares the story and its sources. Nothing about you.

What does this mean for your job?

This is the story as everyone gets it. Once a week we send you the version written for your role — what changed, why it matters for the work you actually do, and one thing to try. Free while we tune it.