Research2026-09-19

Robocurve tested three AI models on dangerous robot commands. GPT-6 Astra completed 60 of 100 unsafe tasks. It stabbed a baby doll in 17 of 20 trials. Claude Fable 5.1 refused all baby doll tasks but never refused others. It put compressed air on a burning stove in 16 of 20 trials. MolmoAct2 never refused but completed only six tasks. None of the models reliably rejected unsafe commands. The benchmark used I2RT-YAM robotic arms and five preset scenarios. All test data and videos are publicly available. The findings come from a Robocurve study.

What changed

No prior public benchmark measured refusal rates for dangerous robot commands.

What it unlocks

Identifying which AI models reliably refuse unsafe physical-world tasks.

  • 60 dangerous tasks completed by GPT-6 Astra
  • 34 dangerous tasks completed by Claude Fable 5.1
  • 6 dangerous tasks completed by MolmoAct2
  • 20 trials per task per model

Send this to someone who needs it

Shares the story and its sources. Nothing about you.

What does this mean for your job?

This is the story as everyone gets it. Once a week we send you the version written for your role — what changed, why it matters for the work you actually do, and one thing to try. Free while we tune it.