Market2026-09-04

Matthew Sun argues that AI companies should stop calling themselves "labs". He is a software engineer and writer based in San Francisco. He says the word borrows the credibility of science for large commercial firms. Sun examined 100 recent research items on the OpenAI and Anthropic research pages. Most had no matching peer-reviewed paper at a journal or conference. He notes it is unclear whether any were submitted, rejected or still under review. Neither company answered requests for comment. He credits both for studying unflattering topics such as sycophancy and disempowerment. He also faults Anthropic for calling student cheating levels hard to measure. He wants firms using the label to open-source code, preregister studies and seek peer review.

What changed

OpenAI and Anthropic mainly did research in their early years.

  • 100 research pieces examined
  • 75%+ trust scientists (Pew 2026)
  • AI spending near 2% of US GDP

Send this to someone who needs it

Shares the story and its sources. Nothing about you.

What does this mean for your job?

This is the story as everyone gets it. Once a week we send you the version written for your role — what changed, why it matters for the work you actually do, and one thing to try. Free while we tune it.